Reading a terahertz inspection spec in gigahertz
Terahertz inspection sits awkwardly between two vocabularies. The imaging system, its emitter and its usable bandwidth are quoted in THz; the electronics that drive it — the synthesizer, the multiplier chain, the lock-in reference, the antenna feed — are all specified in GHz. If you are commissioning a paint-thickness gauge or setting up a scan of a composite panel, one of those two numbers usually has to be rewritten before it can be compared with anything. Drop the THz figure in below and the gigahertz equivalent appears while you type.
What the frequency choice buys you
Depth against detail
Photon energies in millielectronvolts
Wavelengths you can picture
Setting up a scan from the source datasheet
Start with the figure on the emitter sheet
Enter the centre frequency or the band limit as printed — 0.1, 0.35, 1.2, 4. Values below 0.000001 THz would switch the display to scientific notation, but nothing in an inspection spec goes anywhere near that floor.
Match it against the driving electronics
The gigahertz figure is the one that lines up with a multiplier output, a mixer LO or a horn antenna’s rated band. Editing the left field re-runs the comparison on every keystroke, which is quicker than stepping through a spreadsheet.
Copy it into the acquisition settings
The copy button on each field puts the plain number on the clipboard — no unit, no thousands spaces — so it pastes cleanly into a scanner configuration file. Ctrl+C with the cursor in a field does the same.
Flip it when the number arrives in GHz
Antenna and amplifier catalogues talk in gigahertz, so press the swap button (↔) — or simply type into the right-hand field — to get back to the THz value your imaging software expects. Either dropdown can be searched if you need a different frequency unit.
Terahertz sources and the inspection jobs they do
Each row pairs the frequency coverage a supplier prints in THz with the same span written in gigahertz. The right-hand column is what the coverage is normally used for in a non-destructive inspection lab.
| Source or inspection task | Terahertz | Gigahertz | What it is used on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photoconductive-antenna TDS | 0.1–4 THz | 100–4 000 GHz | The workhorse pulsed system; usable dynamic range usually thins out near the top |
| Air-plasma TDS | 0.3–10 THz | 300–10 000 GHz | Extended bandwidth for material characterisation and ellipsometry |
| Frequency-multiplied CW source | 0.1–1.2 THz | 100–1 200 GHz | Continuous-wave imaging and single-frequency transmission checks |
| Quantum cascade laser | 2–5 THz | 2 000–5 000 GHz | High-power narrowband work well above the electronic sources |
| Standoff personnel screening | 0.1–0.35 THz | 100–350 GHz | Sees through clothing; the low end keeps atmospheric loss manageable |
| Automotive paint gauging | 0.1–1 THz | 100–1 000 GHz | Separating clearcoat, basecoat, primer and e-coat on a wet or dry body |
| Foam and CFRP inspection | 0.2–1 THz | 200–1 000 GHz | Disbonds, voids and water ingress in aerospace panels and insulation |
| Tablet coating thickness | 0.1–3 THz | 100–3 000 GHz | Pharmaceutical film coatings measured without cutting the tablet |
Bandwidth limits converted end to end
Enter the low limit, copy it, then the high limit: a 0.2–1 THz inspection window comes out as 200–1 000 GHz with both ends in the same notation as the RF chain.
Fine steps for a narrowband source
A CW source tuned to 0.567 THz reads as 567 GHz, and up to eight decimals are kept, so a small tuning offset does not vanish into a rounded figure.
Other frequency units on the same page
Both selectors search the full frequency list, so a lock-in reference in kHz or a laser repetition rate in MHz can be checked against the imaging band without leaving the page.
Terahertz inspection questions
Why is terahertz radiation described as non-ionising?
Photon energy scales with frequency, and at these frequencies it is tiny. A 1 THz photon carries about 4.1 meV; across the whole 0.1–10 THz range the figure runs from roughly 0.41 to 41 meV. Knocking an electron off a molecule takes on the order of 10 eV, some two thousand times more at 1 THz. The beam can heat a sample if you pour enough power in, but it cannot break chemical bonds the way X-rays do — which is why screening systems using these wavelengths are treated as a different class of instrument.
How deep into a part does the beam actually get?
It depends on both the material and where in the band you look, and the trend is consistent: penetration drops as frequency rises. Low-density foam and dry packaging can be sounded through several centimetres near 0.1–0.2 THz (100–200 GHz), while a filled polymer or a thick paint stack may only give useful echoes for a millimetre or two. Scattering makes it worse — a coarse composite weave or a pigment-loaded coat sends energy sideways long before absorption alone would stop it. In practice you choose the lowest frequency that still resolves the layer you care about.
What bandwidth does a time-domain system really cover?
A standard photoconductive emitter and receiver pair spans roughly 0.1–4 THz, that is 100–4 000 GHz, but the honest working range is narrower: dynamic range falls away steadily above about 3 THz, so the top of the sheet is not the top of the useful data. Air-plasma generation pushes coverage towards 10 THz at the cost of a much bigger optical setup. Time resolution matters as much as bandwidth — the spectral resolution you get is set by how long a delay-line trace you record, not by the emitter.
What sets the spatial resolution of a terahertz image?
Diffraction, in the ordinary way: the focused spot cannot be much smaller than the wavelength. At 0.3 THz (300 GHz) that is close to 1 mm, at 1 THz about 0.30 mm and at 3 THz roughly 0.10 mm, with the optics’ numerical aperture deciding how near you get. Depth resolution is a separate matter — it comes from the pulse length in time, which is why a broadband system can separate coating layers far thinner than its lateral spot size. Near-field probes beat the diffraction limit but only right at the surface.
Which materials are opaque to the beam and which are see-through?
Metal reflects essentially all of it, which is useful: a metal substrate under a coating gives a clean back-wall echo to time against. Liquid water absorbs enormously, so damp cardboard, fresh adhesive or a hydrated tissue sample blocks the beam within a fraction of a millimetre — also useful, because it makes moisture ingress easy to spot. Reasonably transparent are dry paper and card, most plastics and polymer foams, ceramics, textiles and many pharmaceutical excipients — the split that makes this band suited to non-metallic parts and to objects hidden under clothing.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!