Reading Channel Centres Off a Regulatory Table
Spectrum allocations are published in whole hertz. A national frequency plan, a chipset register map or a certification report will happily print 5 955 000 000 where the sticker on the access point says "6 GHz". When you are choosing channels for a deployment, those nine-digit figures have to become the short band labels that survey tools, client radios and floor plans use — while staying exact enough to check against a band edge.
What the band label hides
A centre is only the middle of the occupied span
Band edges are hard numbers, not rounded ones
Two standards share the same 2.4 GHz metres
Turning a Published Channel List Into GHz Labels
Paste the centre exactly as published
Long figures can be dropped in with their spacing intact — spaces are ignored and a comma is read as a decimal point, so a value copied out of a European document needs no cleaning up.
Read the band label, then add half the width
The gigahertz result tells you which allocation the channel sits in. To test whether it fits, work half the channel width outwards from the centre and compare both skirts against the edges of the allocation.
Switch a side to MHz when the source uses it
Plenty of channel tables are written in megahertz instead. Type into the searchable unit list on either side to move that side to MHz without losing the value you already entered.
Reverse it when you only know the label
Given a channel described as 5.745 GHz, the swap control hands back 5 745 000 000 Hz for a configuration file or a test-equipment centre-frequency entry.
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Channel Centres Side by Side
Every figure below is the published centre of a channel, shown first as the regulator writes it and then as a radio planner would say it out loud. The 2.4 GHz rows are deliberately interleaved so the Bluetooth placement makes sense.
| Channel | Centre in hertz | Centre in gigahertz | Where it sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLE advertising 37 | 2 402 000 000 Hz | 2.402 GHz | Bottom of the 2.4 GHz band, in the lower skirt of Wi-Fi channel 1 |
| Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz ch 1 | 2 412 000 000 Hz | 2.412 GHz | Occupies roughly 2.402–2.422 GHz at 20 MHz wide |
| BLE advertising 38 | 2 426 000 000 Hz | 2.426 GHz | In the narrow gap between Wi-Fi channels 1 and 6 |
| Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz ch 6 | 2 437 000 000 Hz | 2.437 GHz | 25 MHz above channel 1, the middle of the three-channel plan |
| Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz ch 11 | 2 462 000 000 Hz | 2.462 GHz | Top of the non-overlapping set in most regulatory domains |
| BLE advertising 39 | 2 480 000 000 Hz | 2.48 GHz | Above channel 11's upper skirt, near the top of the band |
| Wi-Fi 5 GHz ch 36 | 5 180 000 000 Hz | 5.18 GHz | First 20 MHz channel of the low 5 GHz allocation |
| Wi-Fi 5 GHz ch 149 | 5 745 000 000 Hz | 5.745 GHz | Upper 5 GHz group, commonly free of radar-sharing rules |
| Wi-Fi 6 GHz ch 1 | 5 955 000 000 Hz | 5.955 GHz | Lowest 20 MHz channel of the 6 GHz allocation |
| Wi-Fi 6 GHz ch 233 | 7 115 000 000 Hz | 7.115 GHz | Highest 20 MHz channel; its upper skirt lands exactly on 7.125 GHz |
Ten-digit centres survive intact
A 6 GHz centre is a ten-digit number and the last three digits are the ones that decide a band-edge argument. Values are carried through without being truncated to a friendly two-decimal label.
Megahertz tables handled on either side
Channel plans switch between hertz and megahertz depending on who published them. Searching the unit list on one side re-bases that column without retyping the frequency.
Beacon and network channels in one place
Because both sets of centres convert the same way, a Bluetooth advertising frequency and a Wi-Fi channel can be lined up directly when you are explaining an interference complaint.
Questions That Come Up During Wireless Planning
Does the centre frequency tell me how much spectrum a channel uses?
No — the centre and the width are separate specifications. A channel published at 5.18 GHz occupies 5.17–5.19 GHz at 20 MHz wide and 5.16–5.20 GHz once bonded to 40 MHz. Push the same centre to 160 MHz and it would demand 5.10–5.26 GHz, which is exactly why no 160 MHz channel is anchored there: the bottom of the allocation is in the way. The centre stays put while the skirts move outwards, so bonding decisions have to be checked against the edges every time.
Why are only three 2.4 GHz channels considered non-overlapping?
Adjacent channel numbers in that band are spaced 5 MHz apart, but each carrier is about 20 MHz wide, so neighbouring numbers sit almost on top of one another. Channels 1, 6 and 11 are 25 MHz apart in centre frequency — 2.412, 2.437 and 2.462 GHz — which is just enough separation for their occupied spans to stay clear. Everything in between is a compromise that spreads energy across two of the three usable slots.
Where does the 6 GHz allocation begin and end?
Where it is opened in full it runs from 5.925 GHz to 7.125 GHz — 1 200 MHz of contiguous spectrum, more than the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands combined. The lowest 20 MHz channel is centred at 5.955 GHz and the highest at 7.115 GHz, whose upper skirt lands precisely on the top boundary. Several regulators have released only the lower portion, so confirm the ceiling that applies where the equipment will be installed.
How are the three Bluetooth advertising channels spaced?
Bluetooth Low Energy divides the band into forty 2 MHz slots. Three of them carry advertising traffic and sit at 2.402, 2.426 and 2.48 GHz. Those positions are not evenly spread: they were picked to fall in the quiet spaces around the 1 / 6 / 11 arrangement, so a device broadcasting on all three has a good chance of at least one advertisement landing outside the busiest Wi-Fi carrier in the room.
Why do compliance documents print full hertz instead of a short GHz figure?
Because the limits they enforce are defined at exact boundaries, and a rounded label cannot be tested against one. "About 7.12 GHz" is not a statement anyone can measure a transmitter against, whereas 7 115 000 000 Hz plus a stated occupied bandwidth is. The same reasoning applies to the emission masks and guard distances quoted at the ends of every allocation, which is why plans are written in hertz and only spoken in gigahertz.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!